Gaviti pricing: what Gaviti costs, and the one contradiction to settle before you sign

Gaviti publishes no price. Its pricing page carries no dollar figures, no plan tiers and no per-seat rate, only a form and a promise that pricing is "tailored to your usage, not per user." Every number circulating online for Gaviti comes from third-party listings rather than from Gaviti, and at least one of them contradicts the vendor on the one question that changes your budget most: whether you pay per user. This article separates what Gaviti actually states from what gets repeated about it, and gives you the questions that settle a quote.

Gaviti is an invoice-to-cash and collections automation platform headquartered in Tel Aviv, sold to B2B finance teams that want to cut DSO and stop chasing invoices by hand. It is a credible product with a strong review profile. It is also quote-gated in both directions: it will not tell you what it costs, and it will not tell you which systems it connects to. That combination is unusual even in a category where opacity is standard, so it is worth being precise about what is verified.

How much does Gaviti cost?

There is no rate card, so the honest answer is a set of sources ranked by the weight each deserves.

If you need a working budget line before you have a quote, treat a mid-market Gaviti deployment as an annual commitment negotiated on your invoice volume, not a per-seat subscription you can price yourself from a calculator. Then make the sales conversation produce the real number.

Does Gaviti charge per user?

Gaviti says no. Its pricing page states pricing is based on usage "not per user," and lists unlimited users among the things every package includes. That is a genuine differentiator if it holds, because per-seat pricing is what makes most AR platforms expensive to roll out beyond the two people who chase invoices today.

The complication is that at least one detailed third-party profile describes Gaviti pricing as varying by transaction volume, modules, data volume and named users. Both statements cannot be right. Either the third party is describing an older commercial model, or it is describing something Gaviti counts internally but does not present as a seat license. This is not a small discrepancy to leave unresolved, so make it the first question you ask: if we add six more people to the platform next year, does the price change? Get the answer in the contract, not in an email.

What drives a Gaviti quote?

With no rate card, the quote is assembled from your numbers. These are the inputs that move it.

Does Gaviti integrate with QuickBooks or NetSuite?

Gaviti does not say publicly. Its integrations page names no system at all: it states that Gaviti "works with any ERP or business system" and can connect to several at once, without listing QuickBooks, Xero, NetSuite, Sage Intacct, Sage 300, SAP, Dynamics or Salesforce by name. Verified September 5, 2026. Among the major AR automation vendors that is genuinely unusual, because published connector lists are how most buyers build a shortlist in the first place.

Third-party profiles fill the gap with a specific list: prebuilt bi-directional connectors for NetSuite, Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central, Sage Intacct and Priority, API-based integration with SAP including Business One, QuickBooks support, and custom or on-premises systems handled through SFTP, email or HTTPS endpoints. That list is credible and it matches what a platform of this size would be expected to carry, but Gaviti has not published it, so treat it as a starting point for questions rather than a specification.

The practical consequence sits in that last row. If your ledger is not one of the prebuilt four, you are looking at a file-based integration, and file-based integrations are where AR implementations quietly overrun. Ask who builds and maintains it, what happens when your ERP is upgraded, and how a failed file transfer gets detected. Teams that end up wiring several finance systems together this way often find it cheaper to standardize the plumbing with a proper integration layer between apps, APIs and databases than to let every vendor invent its own SFTP drop.

Why so many vendors in this category hide the price

Gaviti is not an outlier here, and knowing that helps you negotiate. Checked against vendor sites, only a handful of receivables vendors publish a real rate card at all. Chaser publishes tiers from 199 GBP a month. Kolleno publishes per-user figures. BILL publishes 49, 65 and 89 US dollars per user per month. Quadient AR publishes no price but does publish a revenue floor, asking that you generate over 7.8 million pounds a year. Invoiced, Versapay, Billtrust, Sidetrade, HighRadius, Tesorio and Gaviti publish nothing.

The reason is straightforward: these platforms are sold on outcome, and the seller wants to know what a percentage point of DSO is worth to you before naming a figure. That is legitimate, and it is also why the same product can be quoted at very different numbers to two companies of similar size. Your defense is competing quotes and your own volume data, in that order.

Is Gaviti worth what it costs?

For the right shape of team, plausibly yes. Gaviti reviews well, the unlimited-users position is real value if it survives the contract, and a collections platform that removes a week of manual chasing every month pays for itself quickly at mid-market invoice volumes. The honest caveats are the two above: you cannot price it yourself, and you cannot confirm it connects to your ledger without a sales call.

Where it fits less well is the team whose problem is not organization but response. If your reminders already go out on time and customers simply ignore them, a better worklist does not fix that. What changes the outcome is escalation: the same overdue invoice moving from email to SMS to an actual phone call as it ages, and the incoming cash getting applied without a person splitting a consolidated ACH deposit across nine invoices by hand. That is the specific gap an AI collections agent is built to close, and it is worth pricing against Gaviti rather than assuming the two are the same purchase.

What to get in writing before you sign

1. Whether users are ever counted. The vendor says usage, not seats. A third-party profile says named users. Settle it in the contract.
2. What happens when invoice volume grows. Usage pricing means a good year raises your bill. Ask for the tier boundaries and a cap.
3. The named integration for your exact ERP, including whether it is prebuilt and bi-directional or a file drop, and who owns it when it breaks.
4. Implementation cost as a separate line, with the go-live date it is priced against.
5. Which modules the quote covers and the price of the ones it does not, before you need them.
6. An exit. Annual billing is the norm here, so negotiate what happens if the pilot does not move DSO.

How Gaviti pricing compares to the rest of the shortlist

Most Gaviti evaluations end up as a three-way or four-way comparison, and the pricing transparency varies more than the feature sets do. If you are running the same exercise across vendors, the sibling breakdowns are worth reading side by side: what Versapay costs, what Billtrust costs and what Quadient AR by YayPay costs all follow the same method, and the pattern across them is consistent. The vendors that publish least are not the expensive ones by definition, but they are the ones where a competing written quote saves you the most.

If Gaviti has already come back with a number you cannot sanity check, the fastest correction is a second quote from a vendor that will put a flat monthly figure in writing against your actual invoice volume. Compare the two on total first-year cost including implementation, not on the monthly headline. For a wider view of what this category really charges, the accounts receivable automation pricing breakdown collects every published figure in one place, and the Gaviti alternative page covers where a different platform fits better.