YayPay pricing: what Quadient AR by YayPay costs, and the revenue floor it publishes instead of a price

Quadient AR by YayPay publishes no price. Its pricing page is a contact form, not a rate card, and the only number Quadient itself puts on that page is a qualifying threshold: you need to be a B2B business generating over 7.8 million pounds in yearly revenue before the sales team will engage. Third-party software directories list a starting figure of around 500 US dollars a month, but Quadient does not publish that anywhere, so it belongs in the hearsay column rather than in your budget.

That revenue floor is the most useful published fact about YayPay pricing, and it is more informative than a price would be. It tells you who the product is built for. If you are a 4 million dollar B2B company hoping for a scaled-down plan, you are not in the target market, and the fastest way to find that out is to read the qualifying criteria rather than to sit through a discovery call.

How much does YayPay cost?

Nobody outside Quadient and its customers knows the rate card. The honest answer is a set of sourced facts with their reliability attached, which is what the table below does. YayPay was acquired by Quadient in July 2020 and is now sold as Quadient Accounts Receivable by YayPay. It is the same product, which matters here because most of the pricing chatter online still uses the older name.

Put together: budget in the low tens of thousands per year if you are a mid-market B2B seller with real invoice volume, and expect the number to be built from your invoice count and the modules you switch on rather than from your headcount. Treat the 500 dollar figure as a floor that a very small deployment might hit, not as a plan you can buy.

What is the Quadient AR revenue requirement?

Quadient asks that you are a B2B business, that you generate over 7.8 million pounds in yearly revenue, and that you are dealing with slow receivables and poor visibility. The revenue line is the one that decides things. In US dollars that lands somewhere near 10 million depending on the day, and it is a soft filter rather than a hard gate, but it shapes the whole conversation. Below it you will either not get a quote or you will get one priced for a company that is not you.

This is unusual and slightly refreshing. Most vendors in this category let anybody book a demo and then quietly disqualify them in week three. Publishing the floor saves both sides the time. If you are under it, look at platforms that publish real rate cards at the small end instead, which is a short list covered in our accounts receivable automation pricing comparison.

What drives the Quadient AR quote up or down?

Three things, in roughly this order.

Invoice and customer volume. Quadient AR prices on usage rather than seats, which is good news for a growing collections team and bad news if you issue a very large number of low-value invoices. Model your peak month, not your average one, because that is the month that will define the band you land in.

Modules. The platform covers a customer payment portal, automated collection tasks with escalation rules, predictive payment-date analytics that Quadient claims are 94 percent accurate, a DSO dashboard, and credit risk scoring. Those are not all one product in a pricing sense. A team that buys collections cadence and a portal is buying something considerably cheaper than a team that adds credit scoring and predictive analytics on top.

Your ledger. Quadient AR publishes connectors for NetSuite, Sage Intacct, Sage 300, Sage X3, Dynamics 365 Business Central, QuickBooks Online, Salesforce and SAP Business One. That is one of the broader lists in the category, and it includes two things most rivals skip: QuickBooks Online and Sage 300. Sage 300 is typically on-premises or privately hosted on SQL Server, and only Quadient AR and ezyCollect publish a connector for it at all. If Sage 300 is your ledger, that scarcity is worth real money at quote time and you should not expect a large discount.

Is the 500 dollars a month figure real?

It appears on several software directories and it may well reflect a genuine small deployment somewhere. What it is not is a published plan. Quadient does not list it, will not confirm it in writing before a discovery call, and prices on variables that make a single headline number close to meaningless. Walking into a negotiation quoting 500 dollars a month at a company doing 40 million in revenue will not go the way you hope.

The more useful benchmark is the discount, not the price. Vendr data on Tesorio, the closest comparable quote-only vendor with a decent sample, shows buyers averaging 25 percent off the opening quote across 58 recorded purchases. That pattern holds wherever pricing is quote-driven. Assume the first number you are given is a starting position.

How does Quadient AR pricing compare to vendors that publish a rate card?

Four platforms in this category will show you a number without a sales call. Comparing against them is the fastest way to sanity-check whatever Quadient quotes you.

The comparison is not apples to apples and it is not meant to be. Chaser at 779 dollars a month and Quadient AR at a quoted enterprise number are aimed at different companies. The point is that if a Quadient quote comes back at four times what a fully loaded Chaser Core costs, you now have a specific question to ask about what the extra is buying.

What should you get in writing before you sign?

Six things, and get them in the contract rather than in an email from a rep who may not be there at renewal.

• The one-time implementation fee, quoted separately from the subscription.
• Which usage metric the price is banded on, and exactly what happens in a month you exceed it.
• Which modules are in scope, named individually, and the price to add each one later.
• Whether your specific ledger version is served by a published two-way connector or by a file import.
• The annual renewal uplift percentage. Five to ten percent a year is common in this category and it compounds quietly, which is why the teams who stay on top of it are the ones who watch renewal dates and subscription spend as it changes rather than rediscovering the increase on an invoice.
• The exit terms, including whether you can export your full collections history and customer contact data.

What are the cheaper alternatives to Quadient AR by YayPay?

It depends which part you actually need. If the draw is the collections cadence and the customer portal, Chaser and Kolleno both publish prices and both serve smaller companies, and Gaviti prices on usage with unlimited users included. If the draw is cash application, HighRadius moved to outcome-based pricing in February 2026, charging nothing until go-live and then taking a share of realized savings, which removes most of the budget risk from a cash application project. If the draw is the Sage 300 connector, your options are genuinely narrow and Quadient AR may be worth the premium.

One capability none of them include is a phone call. Quadient AR does not place outbound collection calls, and neither do Versapay, Billtrust, HighRadius, Gaviti, Invoiced by Flywire, Tesorio or BILL. Sidetrade is the one major exception, through its Aimie agent. If your aging report is full of customers who have simply stopped answering email, that gap matters more than the price difference between any two of these platforms. Our own AI collections agent escalates from email to SMS to a live AI phone call on a flat monthly fee, with no per-seat charge and no percentage of what it collects.

Is Quadient AR worth the cost?

For a B2B company above the revenue floor, running one of its supported ledgers, with a collections team that is drowning in manual follow-up, it is a credible product with a G2 score around 4.4 from roughly 115 reviews and a broader ERP list than most rivals. The question worth answering before the price is what your current situation costs. Multiply days sales outstanding by daily revenue and you get the cash sitting in your aging report right now. For most mid-market sellers that number dwarfs any AR platform subscription, which is why the payback maths usually turns on how many days of DSO the tool removes rather than on the sticker.

If you are comparing several quote-only vendors at once, the full picture of who publishes what, what the third-party contract data actually shows, and the receiver-side fees that routinely exceed the subscription is in our accounts receivable automation pricing breakdown. For the head-to-head on features rather than cost, see Quadient AR competitors.