AccountsReceivable.ai
How it works
AR software AR automation software Collections automation Dunning management Payment reminders Invoice collection B2B collections Outsourced AR AR for small business AR for QuickBooks AR for Xero AR for NetSuite Best AR automation AI collections agent AI AR software AR for SaaS AR management software AR for Sage AR for Sage Intacct Credit management software Order to cash Deduction management AR for construction AR for staffing AR for manufacturing AR for distribution AR for logistics AR for accountants AR for agencies AR for law firms Cash application software Integrated receivables Invoice to cash software Online & cloud AR See all →
Bill.com alternative Quadient alternative YayPay alternative Chaser alternative Upflow alternative Versapay alternative HighRadius alternative Billtrust alternative Tesorio alternative Invoiced alternative Sidetrade alternative Gaviti alternative Growfin alternative Paystand alternative Corcentric alternative Emagia alternative Kolleno alternative Serrala alternative
Pricing Blog

AR automation

Accounts receivable outsourcing companies compared: what each accounts receivable outsourcing firm charges, where the team sits, and when to outsource receivables at all

Accounts receivable outsourcing companies fall into four groups that are priced in four completely different ways, and the group you pick matters far more than the individual name on the contract. Global BPO firms like Genpact and the Big Four run order-to-cash as a managed service for large finance teams. Nearshore and offshore providers like Auxis and QX Global Group rent you a dedicated AR team, billed per full-time person per month. Contingency collection agencies take a cut of what they recover, typically 25 to 50 percent. AI agents run the same chase work as software, on a subscription that does not scale with headcount.

Here are the numbers people search for and rarely find in one place. Third-party 2026 rate reporting puts fully offshore AR delivery from India or the Philippines at roughly 8 to 18 dollars an hour, nearshore delivery from Latin America at 18 to 28 dollars an hour, and onshore US delivery starting around 35 dollars an hour. On a dedicated full-time basis, India-based providers are commonly quoted at 1,200 to 2,000 dollars per person per month and Philippines-based providers at 1,800 to 2,500. A small or mid-sized US business outsourcing the whole AR function is generally reported at 12,000 to 30,000 dollars a year, against 60,000 to 85,000 dollars for one fully loaded in-house AR specialist. Those are published third-party estimates, not rate cards, and every provider on this page quotes rather than publishes, so treat them as a sanity check on the quote you receive rather than a price.

The trap in this category is that almost every top accounts receivable outsourcing companies list you will find is published by one of the outsourcing companies, and it ranks itself first. That is why the list below is organized by delivery model instead of by vendor name. Once you know whether you want a managed service, a rented team, a contingency agency or software, the shortlist writes itself and the sales calls get much shorter.

We build a competing product, an AI accounts receivable agent, so read our own row as our position rather than a neutral verdict. Our pricing is planned and not yet open, so nothing here is a pitch to buy today. Confirm current rates and scope with any provider directly before you sign.

Works inside QuickBooks, Xero & NetSuite Flat monthly fee · no cut of collections

Connect · chase · apply cash · DSO down

Collections Desk

Your books

Collected / wk

Outstanding

AR aging

Current · 30 · 60 · 60+ · paid

Open invoices

Agent worklog

Live

Put this AR on autopilot to watch the agent chase, collect and reconcile.

Dunning sequence

1 Email
2 SMS
3 Call
4 Promise
Paid

Live, interactive · no card, no connection needed

DSO → collected invoices cleared

Flat monthly fee · we never take a cut of what we collect · works inside your accounting system

QUICKBOOKS XERO NETSUITE

Flat fee no cut of collections

Bank-grade security

Why it works

What your team gets with AR outsourcing companies

Four delivery models, four different prices for the same job

A managed service from a global BPO firm puts the whole order-to-cash process under a service contract with agreed metrics, which suits a large finance team that wants to stop running the function. A nearshore or offshore provider rents you named people who work only on your books, priced per full-time equivalent per month, which suits a mid-market team that wants control and lower labor cost. A contingency collection agency costs nothing until it recovers, then keeps 25 to 50 percent of the money, which suits genuinely distressed invoices you had written off. Software or an AI agent does the chase, the matching and the forecasting on a subscription, which suits a team whose invoices are mostly not disputed and mostly just late. Most companies searching for an accounts receivable outsourcing firm actually want the fourth or the second, and get sold the first.

What the rented-team model really costs once you add the hidden line items

The quoted hourly or per-FTE rate is the start, not the total. Budget for the transition project, which is typically four to eight weeks of your own staff documenting a process that has never been written down. Budget for a shadow period where you pay both the provider and your existing person. Budget for the software the provider will need access to, because most AR outsourcing firms work inside your ERP and your email, not their own platform, so the tooling bill stays yours. Then budget for turnover: a rented AR analyst who leaves takes your customer knowledge with them, and the ramp for the replacement is unpaid by the provider but very much paid by you in slower collections. Auxis, one of the larger nearshore providers, markets labor arbitrage of roughly 30 to 50 percent against equivalent US finance roles. That is a real saving, but it is a saving on salary, not on the total cost of running receivables.

Where the team sits decides more than the logo does

Time zone overlap is the single most practical filter. An AR analyst in Manila working US hours is working nights, and attrition follows. A nearshore team in Costa Rica, Colombia or Mexico works your hours in your calendar, which is why Auxis, with about 1,400 professionals across Fort Lauderdale, Costa Rica, Colombia, Mexico and Guatemala, sells that overlap as the product. Offshore India, where QX Global Group and similar providers deliver from, is cheapest per hour and works well for high-volume, rules-based work like cash application and invoice delivery, and less well for a judgment call on a customer relationship. Onshore US delivery costs roughly double offshore and is usually only worth it for regulated industries or for accounts where the person calling has to sound local. Ask any provider two questions: which country will my named people sit in, and what hours will they actually work.

The control problem nobody puts in the proposal

Outsourcing receivables means a third party talks to your customers about money. That is the whole benefit and the whole risk. The two failure modes are opposite and both common. A BPO team that is measured on activity volume sends more reminders than your relationship can absorb, and your best customer calls your VP of Sales to complain. A team that is measured on nothing at all quietly stops chasing the hard accounts and your aging report looks fine right up until the quarter closes. Fix it in the contract, not in the kickoff call. Insist on named people rather than a pool, a written escalation ladder you approve, a hard rule that anything above a stated dollar value or past a stated age comes back to you before further contact, and read-only access for you to every message they send. If a provider resists any of those four, that tells you what the engagement will feel like in month six.

Contingency agencies are a different purchase from outsourcing

These two get conflated constantly in search results and they are not substitutes. A collection agency is paid a percentage of what it recovers, commonly 25 to 50 percent, and is worth it precisely when recovery is uncertain, because zero recovery costs you nothing. But the agency contacts your customer as a third-party collector, which changes the relationship permanently, and you hand over a quarter to a half of the money on invoices that might well have been paid anyway with better follow-up. An outsourcing firm working your normal aging is the opposite trade: you pay whether or not the invoice lands, but the contact stays in your name and your commercial relationship survives. The practical rule most controllers land on is to run normal collections in-house or through an outsourcing firm or software, and reserve the agency for accounts past 120 days that you have already stopped selling to.

When software is simply cheaper than any of them

Run the arithmetic before you take a single sales call. Count the invoices your team sends a month, then count how many of them are late for a reason other than a dispute or a billing error. If most of your late invoices are correct, delivered and simply ignored, you are not buying judgment, you are buying persistence, and persistence is the one thing software is strictly better at than people. It never forgets a promise-to-pay date, never skips a small invoice because a big one is louder, and does not cost more when volume doubles. If, on the other hand, half your aging is short pays, deductions and PO mismatches that need a human to phone a buyer and negotiate, no software will fix that and a rented team probably will. Most mid-market companies have both problems and the honest answer is software for the volume plus one good person for the exceptions, which usually costs less than outsourcing the whole function.

What it handles

Chased, collected and reconciled on autopilot

The agent syncs your invoices, chases each one across email, SMS and phone, applies incoming payments to the right invoice, reconciles your ledger, and predicts when every customer will pay.

  • Connects to QuickBooks, Xero, NetSuite or Sage with a two-way sync, so your ledger stays the source of truth
  • Chases every overdue invoice on a schedule, escalating from email to SMS to a live AI phone call
  • Keeps every message in your company name, so customers never hear from a third-party collector
  • Applies incoming payments to the right invoices, including split payments and short pays
  • Logs each promise-to-pay and follows it up on the date the customer named
  • Costs a flat monthly fee with no percentage of collections and no per-seat pricing
  • Scales with invoice volume without adding headcount, ramp time or turnover
ON EVERY INVOICE In order
  1. 01 Sync Reads the open invoice, its terms and the billing contact from your ledger.
  2. 02 Chase Escalates from email to SMS to a live AI call as the invoice ages.
  3. 03 Track Logs replies, disputes and promise-to-pay dates against the invoice.
  4. 04 Apply Matches the incoming payment, reconciles the ledger and closes the invoice.
Nothing sent without your approved tone

How it compares

Accounts receivable outsourcing companies and the alternatives, by delivery model

Provider facts taken from each company published pages, checked August 2026. Rate ranges are third-party 2026 estimates, not rate cards: every provider here quotes rather than publishes. Vendor performance claims are attributed, not endorsed.

Option Delivery model Where the team sits How it is priced Best fit
Genpact Managed order-to-cash service under a contract with agreed metrics Global delivery, NYSE listed, publishes 800 plus global clients and 25 plus years in process operations Custom managed-service contract, no published rates Large enterprises replacing a whole finance function, not a few late invoices
Big Four (Deloitte, PwC, EY, KPMG) Enterprise managed services and finance transformation Global, usually blended onshore and offshore Custom, typically the most expensive option in the category Enterprises already buying advisory work from the same firm
Auxis Remote teams, managed teams or full managed services for order-to-cash Nearshore Latin America: Fort Lauderdale plus Costa Rica, Colombia, Mexico and Guatemala, about 1,400 professionals, US time-zone aligned FTE-based for rented teams, outcome-based for managed services. Markets 30 to 50 percent labor arbitrage versus US roles, which is its own claim Mid-market US companies that want their hours covered and named people
QX Global Group Offshore dedicated accounting and AR teams Offshore India, aimed at accounting firms and high-volume enterprise operations Per FTE per month. Third-party reporting puts India-based AR FTEs near 1,200 to 2,000 dollars a month High-volume rules-based work like invoice delivery and cash application
Offshore staffing providers (Philippines) Dedicated remote AR staff you manage day to day Philippines. Third-party reporting puts these FTEs near 1,800 to 2,500 dollars a month Per FTE per month, sometimes with a management layer priced separately Teams that want cheap capacity and are willing to manage people directly
Contingency collection agencies Third-party recovery on accounts you have largely given up on Usually US-based call centers 25 to 50 percent of whatever they recover, nothing if they recover nothing Invoices past 120 days on customers you have stopped selling to
AR automation software (Versapay, HighRadius, Quadient AR, Billtrust) You keep the team, the software does the repetitive work Your own office, running vendor software Annual subscription, almost always quote-only. None of these place outbound collection calls Teams with staff who are drowning in follow-up rather than short of judgment
AccountsReceivable.ai An AI agent that runs the chase end to end in your company name Runs on your ledger, no team to hire, host or manage Flat monthly fee planned, no percentage of collections. Not yet open for purchase, waitlist only Teams whose late invoices are correct and undisputed, just ignored

Why AccountsReceivable.ai

One agent that runs the whole receivables job

Not a reminder tool, not a six-figure suite, and not an agency that takes a cut. Chase, collect, apply cash and forecast in one place, on top of the accounting system you already use.

Chases every invoice

The full dunning sequence runs on autopilot across email, SMS and live AI phone calls, polite and on-brand, so no overdue invoice slips through.

Applies the cash

Incoming wires and ACH batches are matched to the right invoices automatically, so your ledger reconciles and you never chase an invoice that already paid.

Cuts your DSO

A predicted pay date for every open invoice and steady follow-up bring DSO down week over week, so more cash lands when you need it.

Good questions

Questions about AR outsourcing companies

Last updated August 2026

Third-party 2026 reporting puts a small to mid-sized US business at roughly 12,000 to 30,000 dollars a year to outsource the AR function, against 60,000 to 85,000 dollars for one fully loaded in-house AR specialist. By delivery model, offshore hourly rates run about 8 to 18 dollars, nearshore Latin America 18 to 28 dollars, and onshore US from about 35 dollars. Contingency agencies instead take 25 to 50 percent of what they recover.
The names that come up most often are Genpact and the Big Four at the enterprise end, Auxis for nearshore Latin America delivery, and QX Global Group and similar offshore providers for India-based dedicated teams. Be careful with published rankings though: almost every top accounts receivable outsourcing companies list is written by one of the providers on it, and it ranks itself first.
A typical scope covers invoice generation and delivery, collections follow-up by email and phone, cash application matching payments to open invoices, deductions and dispute logging, customer statements, and AR reporting. Most firms work inside your ERP and your email rather than bringing their own platform, so the software licences stay your cost. Confirm exactly which of those steps are in scope before you sign.
It is worth it when your late invoices need judgment: short pays, deductions, PO mismatches and negotiations that a person has to phone a buyer about. It is poor value when your late invoices are simply correct and ignored, because you are then paying a salary for persistence that software does more reliably and more cheaply. Sort your aging report by reason before you decide.
The two common failure modes are opposite. A team measured on activity volume over-contacts your customers and damages a relationship you spent years building. A team measured on nothing quietly stops chasing the hard accounts and the aging report looks fine until quarter end. Add data security and turnover to that: a rented analyst who leaves takes your customer knowledge with them.
An outsourcing firm works your normal aging in your name and charges you whether or not the invoice lands. A collection agency contacts your customer as a third-party collector and charges 25 to 50 percent of what it recovers, or nothing if it recovers nothing. The agency is the right tool for genuinely doubtful debt and the wrong tool for an invoice that is 45 days late because nobody followed up.
Pick the delivery model first, then the vendor. Ask four questions of any shortlist: which country will my named people sit in, what hours will they work, what escalation ladder do they follow before contacting a customer above a set value, and can I read every message they send. Providers that resist any of those four tell you what month six will feel like.
Yes, and small businesses are the most common buyers, but the economics are tight. At 12,000 to 30,000 dollars a year, outsourcing only pays for a small company if the recovered cash and the freed-up owner hours clearly exceed that. Below roughly 200 invoices a month, most small businesses get more out of automating the follow-up than out of renting a person to do it.
Split your aging report by reason. Invoices that are correct, delivered, undisputed and just late are a persistence problem, and software wins because it never forgets a promise-to-pay date and does not cost more at double the volume. Invoices held up by disputes, deductions and billing errors are a judgment problem, and a person wins. Most mid-market teams need software for the volume plus one good person for the exceptions.
Most work inside whatever ERP you already run, because they staff people rather than sell a platform, so QuickBooks, Xero, NetSuite and Sage are all normally fine. Software vendors are the opposite and much pickier: Versapay publishes NetSuite, Sage Intacct and Dynamics 365 but not QuickBooks or Xero, and Billtrust and HighRadius publish neither. Check the connector list before you shortlist any software.
Accounts receivable as a service usually means a subscription where a provider runs the whole receivables process for a recurring fee rather than an hourly or per-person rate. In practice the label covers both managed BPO offerings and AI agents that do the work without a team. The useful question is not what it is called but whether you are paying for people, for software, or for a percentage of collections.
Plan on four to eight weeks before the provider is productive, most of it spent documenting a process that has never been written down, plus a shadow period where you pay both the provider and your existing person. Collections usually get slower before they get faster. Ask for a written transition plan with dated milestones rather than a go-live date.
Read every accounts receivable question

Explore more

More ways finance teams collect with AccountsReceivable.ai

Accounts receivable software

The head-term product: chase, collect and reconcile in one agent.

Learn more

Accounts receivable automation software

Automate AR end to end, not just the first reminder email.

Learn more

Best AR automation software

How to choose, and why a true agent beats a reminder tool.

Learn more
See every AR use case See AR pricing Back to the AI AR agent

Go deeper

Work out which of the four options you are actually buying

Accounts receivable outsourcing

The service itself: what outsourcing your receivables covers, and how an AI agent does the same job without a rented team.

Read the comparison

Accounts receivable outsourcing costs

The four pricing models broken down: per invoice, percentage of collections, flat retainer and a dedicated offshore hire.

Read the comparison

How much do collection agencies charge

What contingency rates really run, and the point in the aging where handing an invoice over stops costing you money.

Read the comparison

AR clerk vs automation

The fully loaded cost of one in-house AR specialist against automating the same follow-up work.

Read the comparison

Accounts receivable management software

The software route, for teams whose late invoices need persistence rather than negotiation.

Read the comparison

Collections automation software

Automating the chase cadence itself, which is the part of outsourcing that does not need a person.

Read the comparison

AI collections agent

What an agent does that a rented offshore analyst cannot, including the escalation to a live phone call.

Read the comparison

Accounts receivable software for small business

The option that usually beats outsourcing below roughly 200 invoices a month.

Read the comparison

Best accounts receivable software

The full software shortlist, with the ERP filter that removes several big names early.

Read the comparison

Bill.com competitors

If you are comparing software rather than services, this is the receivables-side shortlist.

Read the comparison

Stop chasing invoices. Put your receivables on autopilot.

Connect your accounting system and the agent chases every invoice, applies the cash and cuts your DSO. Flat monthly fee, and we never take a cut of what we collect.

See pricing

Works with QuickBooks, Xero and NetSuite · bank-grade security · no percentage of collections